World Resources Institute has provided a guide to the High Seas Treaty. For a world that needs world governance, it's an important advance. (Note: the USA is a signatory, but has not ratified the treaty.)
After 20 Years, an Agreement to Safeguard the 'High Seas' Takes Force
Why the High Seas Treaty Matters
"The ambition of the High Seas Treaty has always been immense. It seeks to facilitate international coordination on activities within Earth's largest public common, covering around half the planet's surface.
The high seas host a diverse array of marine life, from microscopic plankton to colossal blue whales. Alongside supporting global fisheries and food security, they are home to valuable natural resources that countries and companies are ever-more eager to explore and exploit. For example, marine genetic materials are increasingly sought after to support pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and other innovations.
Without a binding global treaty, the high seas have been governed patchwork style through regional fisheries agreements, shipping conventions, and scattered marine protected areas which cover less than 1% of the high seas. This leaves critical gaps in protecting marine biodiversity and ensuring that developing countries also benefit from discoveries made in international waters.
The High Seas Treaty will fill regulatory gaps, complement national efforts and enable coordinated conservation measures on the high seas, all of which will be critical for achieving international climate and biodiversity goals. It will also help guide regional cooperation and link seamlessly to countries' sustainable ocean plans, through which 21 nations have pledged to sustainably manage 100% of the ocean areas under their jurisdiction.
Together, these measures will come together to create a more cohesive system of ocean stewardship spanning from coastlines to open ocean."
What if a country has signed it but hasn't ratified it? (I asked that question.)
"As of Jan. 15, the High Seas Treaty has been ratified by 83 parties, who are now legally bound to it. These are also the only countries that will have a say at the treaty summit (BBJN COP) later this year. Countries that have signed but not yet ratified the treaty are not currently legally required to fulfil its requirements. However, they are committed to refraining from activities that contradict the treaty's objectives."

















































