The twitterverse was aflutter with this article from Nature magazine. It seems that there is much less study of the genitalia of females than study of the genitalia of males.
One would think that the headlines in the various articles about this would be interesting, wouldn't one?
I think they could've done better, but here's what I found:
- Genitalia gap: biologists prefer the penis, but why?
- Female genitalia shunned by researchers
- Why do scientists ignore female genitalia?
- Female genitalia are cool, too!
- What is it with scientists and their reluctance to study vaginas?
- Study the lock, not just the key
- Scientists take the boat, but won't float down the tunnel of love
- The sword is interesting, but not the sheath?
- We're all trying to get inside it, so why not study it?
No comments:
Post a Comment